gatus/golang-modernc-sqlite
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Activity

Adding upstream version 1.37.0.

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Baumann 2025-05-17 09:46:10 +02:00
parent 42613ad5c6
commit 271b368104
Signed by: daniel
GPG key ID: FBB4F0E80A80222F
1329 changed files with 4727104 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

93
testdata/tcl/autoindex3.test vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
# 2014-06-17
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
# May you do good and not evil.
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#*************************************************************************
#
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The
# focus of this script is testing automatic index creation logic,
# and specifically that an automatic index will not be created that
# shadows a declared index.
#
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix autoindex3
# The t1b and t2d indexes are not very selective. It used to be that
# the autoindex mechanism would create automatic indexes on t1(b) or
# t2(d), make assumptions that they were reasonably selective, and use
# them instead of t1b or t2d. But that would be cheating, because the
# automatic index cannot be any more selective than the real index.
#
# This test verifies that the cheat is no longer allowed.
#
do_execsql_test autoindex3-100 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,x);
CREATE TABLE t2(c,d,y);
CREATE INDEX t1b ON t1(b);
CREATE INDEX t2d ON t2(d);
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1b','10000 500');
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t2','t2d','10000 500');
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE d=b;
} {~/AUTO/}
# Automatic indexes can still be used if existing indexes do not
# participate in == constraints.
#
do_execsql_test autoindex3-110 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE d>b AND x=y;
} {/AUTO/}
do_execsql_test autoindex3-120 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE d<b AND x=y;
} {/AUTO/}
do_execsql_test autoindex3-130 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE d IS NULL AND x=y;
} {/AUTO/}
do_execsql_test autoindex3-140 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE d IN (5,b) AND x=y;
} {/AUTO/}
reset_db
do_execsql_test 210 {
CREATE TABLE v(b, d, e);
CREATE TABLE u(a, b, c);
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
INSERT INTO "sqlite_stat1" VALUES('u','uab','40000 400 1');
INSERT INTO "sqlite_stat1" VALUES('v','vbde','40000 400 1 1');
INSERT INTO "sqlite_stat1" VALUES('v','ve','40000 21');
CREATE INDEX uab on u(a, b);
CREATE INDEX ve on v(e);
CREATE INDEX vbde on v(b,d,e);
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS sqlite_stat4;
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
}
# At one point, SQLite was using the inferior plan:
#
# 0|0|1|SEARCH v USING INDEX ve (e>?)
# 0|1|0|SEARCH u USING COVERING INDEX uab (ANY(a) AND b=?)
#
# on the basis that the real index "uab" must be better than the automatic
# index. This is not right - a skip-scan is not necessarily better than an
# automatic index scan.
#
do_eqp_test 220 {
select count(*) from u, v where u.b = v.b and v.e > 34;
} {
QUERY PLAN
|--SEARCH v USING INDEX ve (e>?)
`--SEARCH u USING AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (b=?)
}
finish_test