Merging upstream version 1.15.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
692ad0994c
commit
c2f247d236
23 changed files with 191 additions and 194 deletions
150
doc/clzip.info
150
doc/clzip.info
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ File: clzip.info, Node: Top, Next: Introduction, Up: (dir)
|
|||
Clzip Manual
|
||||
************
|
||||
|
||||
This manual is for Clzip (version 1.15-rc1, 23 November 2024).
|
||||
This manual is for Clzip (version 1.15, 10 January 2025).
|
||||
|
||||
* Menu:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ This manual is for Clzip (version 1.15-rc1, 23 November 2024).
|
|||
* Concept index:: Index of concepts
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2010-2024 Antonio Diaz Diaz.
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2010-2025 Antonio Diaz Diaz.
|
||||
|
||||
This manual is free documentation: you have unlimited permission to copy,
|
||||
distribute, and modify it.
|
||||
|
@ -68,12 +68,10 @@ alignment between tar members and lzip members. *Note tarlz manual:
|
|||
The lzip file format is designed for data sharing and long-term
|
||||
archiving, taking into account both data integrity and decoder availability:
|
||||
|
||||
* The lzip format provides very safe integrity checking and some data
|
||||
recovery means. The program lziprecover can repair bit flip errors
|
||||
(one of the most common forms of data corruption) in lzip files, and
|
||||
provides data recovery capabilities, including error-checked merging
|
||||
of damaged copies of a file. *Note Data safety: (lziprecover)Data
|
||||
safety.
|
||||
* The program lziprecover can repair bit flip errors (one of the most
|
||||
common forms of data corruption) in lzip files, and provides data
|
||||
recovery capabilities, including error-checked merging of damaged
|
||||
copies of a file. *Note Data safety: (lziprecover)Data safety.
|
||||
|
||||
* The lzip format is as simple as possible (but not simpler). The lzip
|
||||
manual provides the source code of a simple decompressor along with a
|
||||
|
@ -92,13 +90,12 @@ byte near the beginning is a thing of the past.
|
|||
|
||||
The member trailer stores the 32-bit CRC of the original data, the size
|
||||
of the original data, and the size of the member. These values, together
|
||||
with the 'End Of Stream' marker, provide a 3-factor integrity checking which
|
||||
guarantees that the decompressed version of the data is identical to the
|
||||
original. This guards against corruption of the compressed data, and against
|
||||
undetected bugs in clzip (hopefully very unlikely). The chances of data
|
||||
corruption going undetected are microscopic. Be aware, though, that the
|
||||
check occurs upon decompression, so it can only tell you that something is
|
||||
wrong. It can't help you recover the original uncompressed data.
|
||||
with the 'End Of Stream' marker, provide a 3-factor integrity checking that
|
||||
guards against corruption of the compressed data and against undetected bugs
|
||||
in clzip (hopefully very unlikely). The chances of data corruption going
|
||||
undetected are microscopic. Be aware, though, that the check occurs upon
|
||||
decompression, so it can only tell you that something is wrong. It can't
|
||||
help you recover the original uncompressed data.
|
||||
|
||||
Clzip uses the same well-defined exit status values used by bzip2, which
|
||||
makes it safer than compressors returning ambiguous warning values (like
|
||||
|
@ -300,7 +297,8 @@ clzip supports the following options: *Note Argument syntax::.
|
|||
When compressing, set the match length limit in bytes. After a match
|
||||
this long is found, the search is finished. Valid values range from 5
|
||||
to 273. Larger values usually give better compression ratios but
|
||||
longer compression times.
|
||||
longer compression times. A match is a Lempel-Ziv back-reference coded
|
||||
as a distance-length pair.
|
||||
|
||||
'-o FILE'
|
||||
'--output=FILE'
|
||||
|
@ -569,8 +567,8 @@ The LZMA algorithm has three parameters, called 'special LZMA properties',
|
|||
to adjust it for some kinds of binary data. These parameters are:
|
||||
'literal_context_bits' (with a default value of 3),
|
||||
'literal_pos_state_bits' (with a default value of 0), and 'pos_state_bits'
|
||||
(with a default value of 2). As a general purpose compressor, lzip only
|
||||
uses the default values for these parameters. In particular
|
||||
(with a default value of 2). As a general purpose compressed format, lzip
|
||||
only uses the default values for these parameters. In particular
|
||||
'literal_pos_state_bits' has been optimized away and does not even appear
|
||||
in the code.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -615,7 +613,7 @@ reusing a recently used distance). There are 7 different coding sequences:
|
|||
Bit sequence Name Description
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
0 + byte literal literal byte
|
||||
1 + 0 + len + dis match distance-length pair
|
||||
1 + 0 + len + dis match LZ distance-length pair
|
||||
1 + 1 + 0 + 0 shortrep 1 byte match at latest used distance
|
||||
1 + 1 + 0 + 1 + len rep0 len bytes match at latest used distance
|
||||
1 + 1 + 1 + 0 + len rep1 len bytes match at second latest used
|
||||
|
@ -670,7 +668,8 @@ a complete distance, and is calculated as (slot >> 1) - 1. If a distance
|
|||
needs 6 or more direct_bits, the last 4 bits are encoded separately. The
|
||||
last piece (all the direct_bits for distances 4 to 127 (slots 4 to 13), or
|
||||
the last 4 bits for distances >= 128 (slot >= 14)) is context-coded in
|
||||
reverse order (from LSB to MSB). For distances >= 128, the
|
||||
reverse order (from LSB to MSB) because between distances the LSB tends to
|
||||
correlate better than more significant bits. For distances >= 128, the
|
||||
'direct_bits - 4' part is encoded with fixed 0.5 probability.
|
||||
|
||||
Bit sequence Description
|
||||
|
@ -689,9 +688,8 @@ integers representing the probability of the corresponding bit being 0.
|
|||
The indices used in these arrays are:
|
||||
|
||||
'state'
|
||||
A state machine ('State' in the source) with 12 states (0 to 11),
|
||||
coding the latest 2 to 4 types of sequences processed. The initial
|
||||
state is 0.
|
||||
A state machine ('State' in the source) with 12 states (0 to 11) coding
|
||||
the latest 2 to 4 types of sequences processed. The initial state is 0.
|
||||
|
||||
'pos_state'
|
||||
Value of the 2 least significant bits of the current position in the
|
||||
|
@ -819,10 +817,10 @@ been reviewed carefully and is believed to be free from design errors.
|
|||
7.1 Format design
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
When gzip was designed in 1992, computers and operating systems were much
|
||||
less capable than they are today. The designers of gzip tried to work around
|
||||
some of those limitations, like 8.3 file names, with additional fields in
|
||||
the file format.
|
||||
When gzip was designed in 1992, computers and operating systems were less
|
||||
capable than they are today. The designers of gzip tried to work around some
|
||||
of those limitations, like 8.3 file names, with additional fields in the
|
||||
file format.
|
||||
|
||||
Today those limitations have mostly disappeared, and the format of gzip
|
||||
has proved to be unnecessarily complicated. It includes fields that were
|
||||
|
@ -830,7 +828,8 @@ never used, others that have lost their usefulness, and finally others that
|
|||
have become too limited.
|
||||
|
||||
Bzip2 was designed 5 years later, and its format is simpler than the one
|
||||
of gzip.
|
||||
of gzip. Both gzip and bzip2 lack the fields required to implement a
|
||||
reliable and efficient '--list' operation.
|
||||
|
||||
Probably the worst defect of the gzip format from the point of view of
|
||||
data safety is the variable size of its header. If the byte at offset 3
|
||||
|
@ -852,21 +851,23 @@ the lzip format is extraordinarily safe. The simple and safe design of the
|
|||
file format complements the embedded error detection provided by the LZMA
|
||||
data stream. Any distance larger than the dictionary size acts as a
|
||||
forbidden symbol, allowing the decompressor to detect the approximate
|
||||
position of errors, and leaving very little work for the check sequence
|
||||
(CRC and data sizes) in the detection of errors. Lzip is usually able to
|
||||
detect all possible bit flips in the compressed data without resorting to
|
||||
the check sequence. It would be difficult to write an automatic recovery
|
||||
tool like lziprecover for the gzip format. And, as far as I know, it has
|
||||
never been written.
|
||||
position of errors, and leaving little work for the check sequence (CRC and
|
||||
data sizes) in the detection of errors. Lzip is usually able to detect all
|
||||
possible bit flips in the compressed data without resorting to the check
|
||||
sequence. It would be difficult to write an automatic recovery tool like
|
||||
lziprecover for the gzip format. And, as far as I know, it has never been
|
||||
written.
|
||||
|
||||
Lzip, like gzip and bzip2, uses a CRC32 to check the integrity of the
|
||||
decompressed data because it provides optimal accuracy in the detection of
|
||||
errors up to a compressed size of about 16 GiB, a size larger than that of
|
||||
most files. In the case of lzip, the additional detection capability of the
|
||||
decompressor reduces the probability of undetected errors several million
|
||||
decompressor reduces the probability of undetected errors about 50 million
|
||||
times more, resulting in a combined integrity checking optimally accurate
|
||||
for any member size produced by lzip. Preliminary results suggest that the
|
||||
lzip format is safe enough to be used in critical safety avionics systems.
|
||||
for any member size produced by lzip. Moreover, a CRC is better than a hash
|
||||
of the same size for detection of errors in lzip files because the
|
||||
decompressor catches almost all the large errors, while the CRC guarantees
|
||||
the detection of the small errors (which the hash does not).
|
||||
|
||||
The lzip format is designed for long-term archiving. Therefore it
|
||||
excludes any unneeded features that may interfere with the future
|
||||
|
@ -877,11 +878,9 @@ extraction of the decompressed data.
|
|||
|
||||
'Multiple algorithms'
|
||||
Gzip provides a CM (Compression Method) field that has never been used
|
||||
because it is a bad idea to begin with. New compression methods may
|
||||
require additional fields, making it impossible to implement new
|
||||
methods and, at the same time, keep the same format. This field does
|
||||
not solve the problem of format proliferation; it just makes the
|
||||
problem less obvious.
|
||||
because it is too limiting. New compression methods may require
|
||||
additional fields, making it impossible to implement new methods and,
|
||||
at the same time, keep the same format.
|
||||
|
||||
'Optional fields in header'
|
||||
Unless special precautions are taken, optional fields are generally a
|
||||
|
@ -892,13 +891,12 @@ extraction of the decompressed data.
|
|||
find neither the header CRC nor the compressed blocks.
|
||||
|
||||
'Optional CRC for the header'
|
||||
Using an optional CRC for the header is not only a bad idea, it is an
|
||||
error; it circumvents the Hamming distance (HD) of the CRC and may
|
||||
prevent the extraction of perfectly good data. For example, if the CRC
|
||||
is used and the bit enabling it is reset by a bit flip, then the
|
||||
header seems to be intact (in spite of being corrupt) while the
|
||||
compressed blocks seem to be totally unrecoverable (in spite of being
|
||||
intact). Very misleading indeed.
|
||||
Using an optional CRC for the header circumvents the Hamming distance
|
||||
(HD) of the CRC and may prevent the extraction of good data. For
|
||||
example, if the CRC is used and the bit enabling it is reset by a bit
|
||||
flip, then the header seems to be intact (in spite of being corrupt)
|
||||
while the compressed blocks seem to be unrecoverable (in spite of
|
||||
being intact).
|
||||
|
||||
'Metadata'
|
||||
The gzip format stores some metadata, like the modification time of the
|
||||
|
@ -925,9 +923,9 @@ extraction of the decompressed data.
|
|||
|
||||
'Distributed index'
|
||||
The lzip format provides a distributed index that, among other things,
|
||||
helps plzip to decompress several times faster than pigz and helps
|
||||
lziprecover do its job. Neither the gzip format nor the bzip2 format
|
||||
do provide an index.
|
||||
helps plzip to decompress faster than pigz and helps lziprecover do
|
||||
its job. Neither the gzip format nor the bzip2 format do provide an
|
||||
index.
|
||||
|
||||
A distributed index is safer and more scalable than a monolithic
|
||||
index. The monolithic index introduces a single point of failure in
|
||||
|
@ -960,7 +958,7 @@ software.
|
|||
Three related but independent compressor implementations, lzip, clzip,
|
||||
and minilzip/lzlib, are developed concurrently. Every stable release
|
||||
of any of them is tested to check that it produces identical output to
|
||||
the other two. This guarantees that all three implement the same
|
||||
the other two. This corroborates that all three implement the same
|
||||
algorithm, and makes it unlikely that any of them may contain serious
|
||||
undiscovered errors. In fact, no errors have been discovered in lzip
|
||||
since 2009.
|
||||
|
@ -1207,7 +1205,7 @@ Appendix A Reference source code
|
|||
********************************
|
||||
|
||||
/* Lzd - Educational decompressor for the lzip format
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2013-2024 Antonio Diaz Diaz.
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2013-2025 Antonio Diaz Diaz.
|
||||
|
||||
This program is free software. Redistribution and use in source and
|
||||
binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided
|
||||
|
@ -1258,9 +1256,9 @@ public:
|
|||
const int next[states] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4, 5 };
|
||||
st = next[st];
|
||||
}
|
||||
void set_match() { st = ( st < 7 ) ? 7 : 10; }
|
||||
void set_rep() { st = ( st < 7 ) ? 8 : 11; }
|
||||
void set_short_rep() { st = ( st < 7 ) ? 9 : 11; }
|
||||
void set_match() { st = ( st < 7 ) ? 7 : 10; }
|
||||
void set_rep() { st = ( st < 7 ) ? 8 : 11; }
|
||||
void set_shortrep() { st = ( st < 7 ) ? 9 : 11; }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1564,7 +1562,7 @@ bool LZ_decoder::decode_member() // Return false if error
|
|||
if( rdec.decode_bit( bm_rep0[state()] ) == 0 ) // 3rd bit
|
||||
{
|
||||
if( rdec.decode_bit( bm_len[state()][pos_state] ) == 0 ) // 4th bit
|
||||
{ state.set_short_rep(); put_byte( peek( rep0 ) ); continue; }
|
||||
{ state.set_shortrep(); put_byte( peek( rep0 ) ); continue; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1631,7 +1629,7 @@ int main( const int argc, const char * const argv[] )
|
|||
"See the lzip manual for an explanation of the code.\n"
|
||||
"\nUsage: %s [-d] < file.lz > file\n"
|
||||
"Lzd decompresses from standard input to standard output.\n"
|
||||
"\nCopyright (C) 2024 Antonio Diaz Diaz.\n"
|
||||
"\nCopyright (C) 2025 Antonio Diaz Diaz.\n"
|
||||
"License 2-clause BSD.\n"
|
||||
"This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute "
|
||||
"it.\nThere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.\n"
|
||||
|
@ -1729,23 +1727,23 @@ Concept index
|
|||
|
||||
Tag Table:
|
||||
Node: Top205
|
||||
Node: Introduction1282
|
||||
Node: Output7168
|
||||
Node: Invoking clzip8771
|
||||
Ref: --trailing-error9617
|
||||
Node: Argument syntax19833
|
||||
Node: File format21597
|
||||
Ref: coded-dict-size23096
|
||||
Node: Stream format24328
|
||||
Ref: what-is-coded26853
|
||||
Node: Quality assurance35583
|
||||
Node: Algorithm44382
|
||||
Node: Trailing data47784
|
||||
Node: Examples50118
|
||||
Ref: concat-example51564
|
||||
Node: Problems52788
|
||||
Node: Reference source code53324
|
||||
Node: Concept index68636
|
||||
Node: Introduction1277
|
||||
Node: Output6979
|
||||
Node: Invoking clzip8582
|
||||
Ref: --trailing-error9428
|
||||
Node: Argument syntax19721
|
||||
Node: File format21485
|
||||
Ref: coded-dict-size22984
|
||||
Node: Stream format24216
|
||||
Ref: what-is-coded26748
|
||||
Node: Quality assurance35562
|
||||
Node: Algorithm44357
|
||||
Node: Trailing data47759
|
||||
Node: Examples50093
|
||||
Ref: concat-example51539
|
||||
Node: Problems52763
|
||||
Node: Reference source code53299
|
||||
Node: Concept index68607
|
||||
|
||||
End Tag Table
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue