Adding upstream version 1.6~rc2.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cbac3ebd04
commit
9f656b1637
21 changed files with 947 additions and 1256 deletions
24
NEWS
24
NEWS
|
@ -15,3 +15,27 @@ Minilzip now copies file dates, permissions, and ownership like "cp -p".
|
|||
bits S_ISUID and S_ISGID are cleared).
|
||||
|
||||
"lzlib.texinfo" has been renamed to "lzlib.texi".
|
||||
|
||||
The license has been changed to "GPL version 2 or later with link
|
||||
exception".
|
||||
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale for the license change.
|
||||
|
||||
I have recently been shocked to know that it is apparently not legal to
|
||||
use lzlib in GPLv2 programs. Linking those programs with lzlib violates
|
||||
the GPLv2. But linking proprietary programs with lzlib is fine and legal!
|
||||
|
||||
This problem is not caused by any fault in lzlib's link exception; the
|
||||
LGPLv3 has the same problem. See for example
|
||||
http://nmav.gnutls.org/2013/03/the-perils-of-lgplv3.html
|
||||
|
||||
Of course it was never my intention to prevent GPLv2 programs from using
|
||||
lzlib. I'm sorry for any inconveniences my oversight may have caused to
|
||||
distributions, GPLv2 software projects, and users in general.
|
||||
|
||||
I am also ashamed of having participated in this schism of the GPL
|
||||
community. The mere proliferation of different free software licenses is
|
||||
a burden in and of itself. From now on I'll license all my projects and
|
||||
contributions in a way compatible with the GPLv2.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue